Sarah_Maccu_Piccu.JPG St_Johns_Drew___Erin__cean.JPG horsetooth_half_2007_bob_allie_tim.jpg

Did Michael Phelps Really Win that 7th Gold?

Milo_cavic_beats_phelps.jpgWithout a doubt, Michael Phelps was the superstar of the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics. Setting a new world record by winning 8 gold medals in one Olympic year, Phelps could seemingly do no wrong. He became America’s golden boy and his events helped propel the Beijing Olympics into the most watched television event in history.

But did he actually win all 8 gold medals? Some people don’t think so. His 7th win, over Milorad Cavic in the 100 meter butterfly, has become quite controversial. So controversial in fact, that bloggers, the website 100th of a Second, and Olympic viewers are questioning the authenticity of his world record.

This photo, taken from The Adventurist blog, shows Milorad Cavic (bottom) beating Michael Phelps (top) pretty clearly. But why didn’t the judges see this and make the correct call? Well, apparently the timekeeping device was made by Omega, a company that just happens to sponsor Phelps (and has since 2004).

Coincidence or controversy? What do you think – did Michael Phelps deserve his 7th win? Or was Phelps’ record just another Beijing illusion?

Via The Adventurist

  • Ryan Lockwood says:

    A pad on the wall of the pool actually stops the clock and records a swimmer’s final time, not a person. While I thought (and still think) it LOOKS like Cavic won, I think that is an illusion. His fingers closed that last few inches VERY slowly compared to Phelps. If Cavic did actually win, then that means the timers for the pads were not calibrated right… another possibility. That would be pretty sad, though… you would think that for the Olympic Games those things would be dead-on.

  • Allie Comeau's response:

    You’re right, Ryan. It was a device and apparently the device is made by Phelps’ sponsor, Omega. Not that that means he didn’t win (or that it’s even possible they could have fixed it) – I just think it’s an interesting coincidence.

    You would hope that we wouldn’t have to worry about things like that at the Olympic Games, but unfortunately controversial results are nothing new.

    Thanks for your comment, Ryan.

  • Todd says:

    Honestly? Neither coincidence, nor controversy!

    It was simply a close race – and Phelps won. Even Cavic’s coaching staff agrees.

    We’ve wasted enough electricity here.

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0808/oly.phelps.sequence/content.1.html

  • uruba siddiqui says:

    ya, it seems so that Cavic was there before Phelps but then no one can say that its real or just that people are making up such things.It is possible both ways,but chances are that Phelps was the winner or else it would have been objected by Cavic.But then you never know what actually had happened.

  • Allie Comeau's response:

    Those photos are definitely better from Sports Illustrated…

* = required